2011年3月9日 星期三

Google Android 3.0 'Honeycomb' review

Honeycomb is a whole different beast from the Google Android we've come to know. While

previous versions of Google's mobile operating system were built for smartphones, Honeycomb -

also known as Android 3.0 - is the first to be designed specifically for tablet PCs. And

seeing it in action, it certainly shows.

Motorola's recently launched Xoom is the first in a series of tablets that'll run the

Honeycomb OS. The Motorola Xoom has made plenty of headlines for its high-end specs: The

tablet boasts a dual-core 1-GHz processor with 1GB of RAM. It has 32GB of internal storage,

plus the option for additional storage via an integrated MicroSD slot. And all of that is

housed beneath a beautiful (if slightly glare-prone) 10.1-in display.

But the truth is, while the Xoom's hardware is impressive, it's the software that's the much

bigger story. I took a long look at Honeycomb to see how it compares to earlier versions of

Android and to its popular competitor, Apple iOS for the Apple iPad.

Google Android Honeycomb
Google Android 3.0 'Honeycomb': The home screen advantage

When you power up an Android Honeycomb tablet like the Xoom, you'll find yourself on one of

the device's five available home screens. These home screens and the functionality they

provide are among the most significant advantages Honeycomb offers over competing tablet

platforms.

Where the iPad's operating system is basically a blown-up version of what you get on the

iPhone - static rows of square-shaped icons - Honeycomb includes several features that take

full advantage of the tablet's ample screen real estate.

Among the most useful features are the widgets, which are effectively live, functioning apps

that run right on your home screen. You can have a widget for your email, for example, that

allows you to view and even scroll through your inbox. Other widgets let you browse your

calendar, flick through news stories or see the current weather for your area, without ever

opening a thing.

The idea of widgets, of course, isn't new to Honeycomb; as any Android smartphone user knows,

widgets have long been a part of Google's mobile operating system. With Honeycomb, however,

widgets have become more interactive than ever - you can now scroll, flick and interact

within the widgets themselves. And given the large screen size of a tablet, their potential

becomes far more significant.

On a single screen of the Xoom, for example, I'm able to simultaneously see my inbox, my

upcoming appointments and my local weather forecast. I also have scrollable access to all of

my Chrome bookmarks, synced continuously from my PC. I'd imagine that after growing

accustomed to this kind of advanced-usage scenario, many users would be reluctant to return

to the static environment a platform like Apple's iOS provides.

Honeycomb, like past Android versions, also affords you the freedom to use your home screen

space as you see fit; you can drop any combination of widgets and app shortcuts where you

like. The actual method for customizing is quite different in Honeycomb than in previous

Android releases; while it may be an adjustment for Android phone users, it strikes me as a

far more intuitive approach.

On an Android smartphone, adding a widget requires you to either long-press your home screen

or tap your phone's "menu" button to find the command. Adding app shortcuts and changing

wallpapers are separate processes.

In Honeycomb, on the other hand, you simply tap a "plus" icon at the top-right corner of the

display to enter an all-in-one home screen customization tool. There, you find thumbnails for

your five home screens, along with lists of every widget, app shortcut and wallpaper on your

tablet. You can touch any item to select it and drag it onto a home screen. Then, on the home

screen itself, you can touch and hold any item to move it around or eliminate it altogether.

Is it simple enough that a 2-year-old could figure it out? Not necessarily. But this is a

tablet, not a toy - and what you lose in foolproof simplicity is a trade-off for what you

gain in powerful functionality.

沒有留言:

張貼留言